Thursday, May 23, 2013

2013年第一季砂州立法议会辩论词


Tuan Speaker,

I rise to debate on the Motion in appreciation to the speech delivered by his Excellency Tuan Yang Terutama (TYT) in this august House on this 20th day of June 2013.
Malaysia is a multi-racial society where we all live in harmony regardless of our racial, religious and cultural backgrounds for the past 55 years and we are proud to call ourselves Malaysian.
I have many friends and among them are Ismail, Najib, Noradin, Siti, Fatimah, Azizah, Anwar, William Ekie, Bob Bahru, Ramli Malarka,Join Brain, Bahru Bian, Wong, Ting, Yong, Fong, Ling , Singh, Siva and many others just to mention a few. I am proud to have friends who are Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu and Sikh.
But certain quarters are willing to incite hatred among us by issuing racist statements in the press before and after the just concluded general election for their own selfish agendas. These peoples must be condemned and the full force of the law must wield on them for their seditious statements that could caused mistrust and tension among the different ethnic groups in Malaysia.
In a forum organized by UiTM Malaysia Alumni Association and Gabungan Pelajar Melayu Semenanjung in Kuala Lumpur, Mohd Noor, ex-judge of the court of appeal,  warned the Chinese that there would be a backlash for their “betrayal” of the ruling party at the 13th general election.
The Utusan Malaysia, the organ and mouth piece of the UMNO, on its front page headline asks “ Apa lagi  Cina Mahu?”  
DR MAHATHIR: CHINESE 'REJECTED MALAY HAND OF FRIENDSHIP'
The former PM, Tun Mahatir, is at the forefront of the “hate” campaign. “I have said this several times in my campaign, even in Johor. Lim Kit Siang brought about the concept of Malaysian Malaysia, with the intention of making the Chinese hate the Malays,” he said. 
For the past half a century, the Chinese have been the loyal supporters of the BN and the DAP never say anything about betrayal of the Chinese but accept their choice and decision which is the hallmark of a democracy.

PM: Chinese tsunami
Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak blames the poor performance of the BN on a Chinese Tsunami! How could it be a Chinese Tusnami when the PR won 51.7% of the popular vote on the the GE13? Even if all the Chinese vote  (which is not the case) for the PR, if the Malays and Indians and Dayaks and Kedazan-Dusun and Orang Asli and Orang Ulu did not vote for the PR, then the PR will not be able to get more than  25% of the votes.
Tuan Speaker, this Dewan should set an example for all the Malaysian by being the first in Malaysia to take a stand on Racist and we should join force to condemn all who had uttered and fanned the racist remark regardless of their position and standing. We should not let our political divide becomes a racial divide, our country cannot sustain a racial discord and our rakyat should not be subject to these kinds of racial bashing and rhetoric.
Let’s see what Malaysian generally want from the results of the GE13 and how we shall move from here.  Not only did BN lose a further seven seats to Pakatan, but it won with only 47% of the popular vote, this speaks loud about whether the general population support the BN’s call for stability, continuity and economic growth, or support the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR or People’s Alliance) call for the end of corruption, the institution of minority rights and dealing with issues over the cost of living.
The BN wins the polls by political gerrymandering and handouts in the form of BR1M and the use of government’s machineries such as mass media and racial bashing in certain areas and secured 133 parliamentary seats although the PR won 51.7% of the popular votes.
Many youths are angry that their votes did not count because they felt that how could 51.7% of them lost to 47%, mana ada adil? Hundreds of thousand thronged the “Blackout” rally organized by the PR in Selangor, Penang, Ipoh and even Sibu. The participants were from different ethnic backgrounds and NOT the Chinese alone, I must stress.
A record electoral turnout and over half a century of essentially one-party rule, the Malaysian people  embrace  change; Ubah! Although we came short in making history by becoming the new federal government but Malaysian had risen to the challenge and turn up in force to participate in the election process by becoming the campaign volunteers or becoming the polling agents and counting agents and monitoring the election process. This is a victory for Malaysia by its own right and we are proud of them.
The BN governments must look at the results and come to terms that people demand change. If BN wants to regain the people’s trust and recover some lost ground from Pakatan Rakyat, it simply has to change. Don’t point finger at the Chinese community when there has been an urban swing to Pakatan by all communities living in major towns, cities and suburbs.
Top among the issues that saw BN losing ground is the Corruption and follows by the Cronyism and nepotism which has become the trademark of the BN administration. Other agendas are the inflation and low salary-trap of the middle Malaysian. People are crying out loud for fairer distribution of wealth and resources and when their voice are not heard they turn to the ballot box demanding change, that’s the main reason why their voted for Pakatan Rakyat and BN has to accept their decision no matter what.

Sarawak, Tanah Air ku
Sarawak rural folks remain the “fixed deposit” of the BN although the PR managed the biggest win in the history with 6 urban seats under its belt. The state BN managed to get 25 out of the 31 parliamentary seats and thus helping the BN to hold on to the power.
Sarawak becomes the kingmaker in this election contributing 18.79% of the seats to BN, and without the Sarawak-based parties the BN would collapse as they have only 108, which is short of the 112 threshold to form the government.
The people in Sarawak now expect returns and they expect the state BN to deliver to them what the BN promised during the general election.

Now the question is “would 6 ministers and 4 assistant ministers solve our problems?”
The PM announced the new cabinet line-up on the 15th May 2013 and Sarawak is rewarded 6 full ministers and 4 assistant ministers in Najib’s administration. Expectedly, the PBB is the biggest winner with 4 ministers and 3 assistant ministers while the SPDB got none.
Remember that we are still one of the poorest states in Malaysia and we are behind our counterparts in the peninsular Malaysia by at least 20 years in infrastructure developments.
Questions such as the following must be addressed by the Sarawak BN:
Would Pan Borneo Highway be constructed into a dual carriageway without tolls in the next 5 years? PR promised that in the GE13 manifesto and people expect the BN to deliver as well.
Would all the folks in Sarawak be able to enjoy treated piped water as well as electric current in the next 5 years? 30% of rural Sarawak has no electricity and 41% are without piped water, this speaks volume of the developments of Sarawak.
Can the federal government help us to wipe out poverty in 5 years? According to the federal Ministry of Finance, up to September 30th, 2009, there are 10,531 families in Sarawak in the category of hard core poverty and there are 14,528 household in the category of poverty. Among these, 70% are Dayaks!
 Will the federal government grant us 20% oil royalty? The PR’s GE13 election manifesto has promised 20% oil royalty if they take Putrajaya,it is time the BN  state government demand that from the BN federal government.
Would the Lanang Bridge’s toll be abolished? The toll collection for the said bridge has become a stagnant hold on the economy developments for Sibu, Meradong and Sarikei.
How would the resources of Sarawak be distributed more fairly? Would Sarawakian be able to enjoy lower electricity tariff taking into consideration that Bakun HEP project.
I hope the CM can enlighten us on these in his ministerial reply soon.

Sibu, too many unresolved issues
Two years ago in my maiden speech in this August House I said :

Road and drainage infrastructures in Sibu
Sibu is famous for its notorious infrastructures, the roads look like those in the war-torn countries and words can’t describe the drainage systems in Sibu. One would think and feel that he is riding a boat instead of a car; the car swears as if it’s riding the waves and then potholes everywhere would rock the car as if it is hit by a rocket. The drains, some of them in the constituency of Pelawan are upside down, imagine that!
Only in Sibu can one really see amazing sites like these .When the Rakyat complain to the authorities concerned, they would be told “No money”. Now the Rakyat know that the government would only pave certain stretches of road if there is an election coming.
The government best excuse would be Sibu is located on the peat soil area and thus it is costly to build proper roads and drains and the maintenance is very expensive. If that is the way of governing, who would need a government?

During the last session of the Dewan meeting, I said

1)      ”The AG’s report for 2012 has pointed out that the local council in Sibu(SMC) has failed to fully utilized the grants from the federal and state government from 2009-2011. Out of the total sum of RM 62.17 million only RM 49.03million was utilized, we would like the Minister of Local Government and Community Development to explain to the House where the rest of the money are?” I am still waiting for a reply and the people of Sibu are waiting for an answer as well.

    Lamp posts
2)      There are many areas in Sibu where there isn’t street lighting and lamp posts along the major roads and streets;
3)      1) Ulu Sg. Merah  Lorong 38-48, residents moved into 5 years ago and yet the road between lane 38-48 are still without lamp posts. 
4)      2) The middle 2 km stretch of Jalan Tun Ahmad Zaidi Adruce linking the Salim road to the Sibu-Bintulu road to the airport is not even planted with lamp posts. Countless accidents had happened over the years and lives were lost because of it.


Crimes and security
Cyber gambling is so rampant in Sarawak and the social ill that it brings have made many families broken and many youths have resorted to robbery and theft to settle the gambling debt thus contributing to more crimes against the society at large.

The state government needs to set up a task force to monitor the police performance in tacking the cyber gambling immediately as

I am sorry to say that not much has been done as if the government did not do anything at all. Peoples are fed up with the government and they have lost faith in the BN to deliver and that is one of the reasons why the majority voted for the PR/DAP in the just concluded GE13.

Tuan Speaker, we have a reserve of some RM 18 billion and our state coffer is rich enough to bring developments to all the folks.
But when we ask for better roads and drainage system, the local government replies “No Money!”
When we ask for free WiFi, the minister reply “no need!”.
 When we ask for street lamps, the minister reply is “Upon availability of funds”
When we ask for specialists at the general hospital, the minister replies “can’t find them!”
When we ask that crimes be stop, they say “it is a federal issue!”
When we ask for meritocracy in the civil servants’ recruitment, the minister replies “Chinese not keen!”
When we ask for ministers and assistant ministers to declare personal asset, their just pretend they did not hear it.
When we ask for the Pan Borneo Highway to be upgraded to a dual carriage highway, the minister replies “we will do it by stages.”
When we want annual systematic allocation to the Chinese Independent schools, they say “education is a federal issue.”
When we speak out for our Dayak communities, the minister replies “I am a Dayak, I know to take care of my own people.”
When we say we want 20% oil royalty, the minister says “we are getting it through other allocations for projects”
When we want solutions for our economy woes, the CM’s answer is “SCORE”
When we ask that all the government projects be subject to open tender system, they just pretend deaf and dumb.

When the CM says “"They (MACC) don't deserve my cooperation because they have been naughty... and they have not been honest,” we know our CM is the most powerful man in Malaysia already.

Tuan Speaker,
How can we truly bring developments and reform to Sarawak when the ministers and assistant ministers do not even care to answer the questions in this Dewan? How can we have a transparent government when the ministers and assistant ministers do not declare their personal assets? How can we have a clean and efficient government when the families and cronies of the leaders are given government projects? How can we wipe out corruption when the MACC has been belittled and yet they don’t dare to say anything or take any action?

But one thing is for sure, the political landscape of Malaysia has changed and people can see the difference they can make with their votes. As society progress and as the social media network reach the rural area, the wind of Change would spread to all corner of Sarawak and Malaysia and unless the BN governments  buckle up they will be blown away in the coming election.

Tuan Speaker, I speak with my clear conscience without fear and favor and that is my responsibility and duty as the elected wakil of the people. I just wish that all the ADUN in this August House will put their interests aside and speak out for the people of Sarawak for once.

Tuan Speaker, thank you and God bless us all!


议长先生

马来西亚是一个多元种族的社会,过去55年来我们不分种族,宗教和文化背景,大家都和谐的生活在一起。我们感到很自豪被称为马来西亚人。
我有很多朋友,当中有Ismail, Najib, Noradin, Siti, Fatimah, Azizah, Anwar, William Ekie, Bob Bahru, Ramli Malarka,Join Brain, Bahru Bian,黄,张,陈,杨,房,林,Singh, Siva以及其他更多不同的姓氏,以上只是一些例子。我感到自豪因为拥有穆斯林,基督徒,佛教徒,印度徒和锡克教徒的朋友。
但是在刚刚结束的全国大选之前和之后,一些种族主义者为了达到本身的议程不惜通过媒体发表煽动性的言论来挑起种族间的仇恨。这些肇事者必须受到严厉的谴责以及法律的制裁。因为他们煽动性的言论可能造成马来西亚不同族群间的不信任和紧张。
前上诉庭法官莫哈默诺阿都拉在一场由玛拉工艺大学校友会与半岛马来学生联盟所联办论坛上警告华裔必须承担第13届大选“背叛”后反弹的后果。
马来西亚前锋报,一家为巫统发言的报章,在头版刊登“华人到底要什么?”

敦马哈迪:“华人拒绝马来人友谊之手”
前首相敦马哈迪,站在最前线号召“恨”情绪运动。他说“我在竞选期间已经说了很多次,即使在柔佛。林吉祥带来所谓的马来西亚人的马来西亚,其意图是想让华人憎恨马来人”。
在过去的半个世纪中,华裔是国阵的忠实支持者。但是行动党从来没有说华裔是背叛者,我们接受他们的决定和选择,因为这是民主国家的象征。

首相:华人海啸
首相纳吉将国阵不佳的选举成绩归咎于华人海啸!在第13届大选民联得到51.7%的支持率,这怎么可以被喻为华人海啸?即使所有华人投民联(事实并非如此),如果马来人,印度人,达雅族,杜顺人和原住民没有投给民联,民联不可能得到超过25%的选票。
议长先生,这议会应该首开先例成为马来西亚首个针对种族主义表明立场的议会,以身作则合力谴责发表种族煽动性言论者,不论他们的身份和地位。我们不能让政治鸿沟演变成种族鸿沟,我们国家不能够支持种族不和谐,我们的人民不能陷入种族仇恨和华丽虚饰的言语。
让我们来看看大部分的人民要求什么样的第13届选举成绩。我们应该从这里做为起步点。国阵不仅输掉7个席位,而且只赢得47%的支持率,这说明了普遍上人民支持国阵的稳定性,持续性和经济增长或支持民联(民联或人民联盟)的号召要求终结贪污,少数人权机构和一切关于生活费用的问题。
国阵赢得选举透过政治徇私及派发一马援助金,使用政府机制例如主流媒体以及在部分地区制造种族仇恨。国阵以133席简单多数议席险胜,然而民联却获得51.7%的支持率。
许多年轻选民感到愤怒,他们觉得他们的选票没有被计算,为何51.7%的支持率却输给47%支持率,这样那里会公平?上百万的人民参与由民联号召的“黑色”集会,这些集会分别在雪兰莪,槟城,怡保甚至是诗巫举行。我必须强调这些参与者都来自不同种族背景,不只是华人而已。
创纪录的选举投票率,基本上半个世纪多以来都是一党在统治,如今马来西亚人民要拥抱改变!虽然我们创造了历史,但是我们无法成立新的联邦政府。但是马来西亚人民已经接受挑战,勇于以义工的身份参与竞选活动,例如监票员,计票员来监督选举的过程。这是马来西亚的胜利,透过他们的权利,我们为他们感到骄傲。
国阵政府必须关注选举结果,并且做出转变来迎合人民的需求。如果国阵要重拾人民的信任及收复失去的议席,政府务必做出改变。不要把矛头指向华社,当所以住在主要城镇,城市和郊区不同族群的选民转投民联。
让国阵失去基本票源的主要因素是贪污,朋党及裙带作风已经成为国阵治国的标志。其它影响中间人民的议题包括通货膨胀和低工资陷阱。生活在水深火热的人民要求更公平的分配财富和资源,当他们的声音不被重视的时候,他们唯有透过选票来要求改革。这是选民转投民联的主要原因,无论如何国阵都要接受他们的决定。

砂拉越,我生长的土地
砂州的农村依旧是国阵的“定存”,即使民联已经创造历史,夺得最大的胜利,赢取6个议席。砂国阵在31国会议席当中赢取了25个国会议席,为国阵保住了联邦政权。
砂州成为造王者,此届选举为国阵贡献了18.79%的席位。倘若,没有砂州本土政党,国阵仅有108席,在最少必须拥有112席才能组织新政府的情况下,国阵将会倒台。
砂州人民不要求任何回报,他们只要求州政府可以兑现选举时所许下的承诺。

现在的问题是“6个部长和4名助理部长能够解决我们的问题吗?”
首相在515日宣布新内阁阵容,砂州被分配到6个名额的正部长和4个名额的副部长进入纳吉所领导的新内阁。特别是最大赢家的土保党被分配到4名正部长和3名副部长,可是民进党却没有得到任何内阁成员的名额。
请记住,我们依然是马来西亚最贫穷的州属之一,在基本建设上我们至少落后西马20年。
砂州政府必须解决以下的问题:
在未来5年砂州政府是否将泛婆公路提升为双程大道,而且不收取过路费?民联已经在第13届全国大选的宣言中承诺,人民希望国阵政府可以实现同样的计划。
在未来5年住在乡区的人民是否可以享有清洁的自来水供应和电流供应?30%的乡村居民没有电流供应,41%没有自来水供应,以这样的论述来发展砂州。
联邦政府是否可以协助砂州在5年内摆脱贫困?根据联邦财政部,截至2009930日,砂州有10531个家庭被归类为极度贫困,14528个家庭被归类为贫困。当中70%是达雅族群!
联邦政府是否提升石油开采税至20%?民联在第13届大选宣言中承诺一但入主布城将给予20%的开采税,这是时候州政府向联邦政府表达这项需求。
南兰大桥是否取消收费?大桥收费制已经造成诗巫,马拉端和泗里街的经济停歇不前。
如何将砂州的资源更公平的分配?砂州在拥有巴贡水利发电站的优势下,是否考虑降低电费供人民使用。
我希望首长可以尽快让得到相关部门的答复。

诗巫,许多悬而未决的问题太多
在两年前,我首次在这神圣的殿堂演讲时说:

诗巫的道路和排水系统的基本建设
诗巫的基本建设臭名远播,道路好比战国时代状况及无法用语言形容的排水系统。人们坐在车里的感觉犹如逆水行舟,道路的坑洞造成汽车摇晃,汽车仿佛乘风破浪,就好象被火箭击中般。在柏拉旺选区里的部分地区的排水沟倒挂,想象一下那样的状况!唯独诗巫可以看到这样的奇观。当人民向相关单位投诉的时候,他们被告知没有“没有钱”。现在人民已经知道政府只会在选举的时候铺平一定的路段。政府以诗巫是泥炭沼泽地做为无法提供良好基本建设的最佳借口,因为一切的维修费非常昂贵。如果那就是政府的施政方式,那我们为何还需要政府?
在去年第二季的会议时我说:
1) 诗巫市议会(SMC)在2012年稽查报告中被点名没有善于利用2009-2011年由联邦政府和 州政府所给予的拨款。在总数6217万拨款当中只有4903万被利用,我们要地方政府及社区发展部向议会解释这些剩余拨款的去向?我仍然等待答复,诗巫人民都在等待答案。 

路灯
2) 在诗巫有许多地区的道路和街道没有路灯;
3) 1)乌鲁顺溪美拉3848巷,居民已经迁入该住宅区5年,可是在38巷至48巷之间依然还没有路灯设备。
4) 2)连接沙廉路至诗巫-民都鲁路和机场的敦阿曼再迪安都鲁斯路间中两公里的路段没有路灯设备。每年拥有无数的交通意外发生,许多宝贵的生命在这里丧生。

罪案和安全
砂州网络赌博非常猖獗,这社会问题造成许多家庭破裂,许多年轻人透过偷窃和打枪来偿还赌债。这为社会增加了更多的罪案率。州政府必须设立特别小组来监督警队的表现,立即打击网络赌博。
我非常的抱歉说;能力有限,如果政府没有采取任何行动。人民将对政府感到厌倦及对国阵政府失去信心。这就是为何在刚过去的第13届大选民联/行动党得到绝大多数人民的支持。
议长先生,我们拥有186亿的储备金,我们州财库丰盛,拥有足够的能力提供发展给砂州子民。可是,当我们要求更好的道路和沟渠时,地方政府的回应是“没有钱!”
当我们要求免费无线上网时,相关部长回应说“不需要!”
当我们要求路灯时,相关部长回应说“没有相关拨款!”
当我们要求中央医院要有专科医生时,相关部长回应说“不能找到他们!”
当我们要求打击罪案时,他说那是“联邦的课题!”
当我们要求以绩效制来聘请公务员时,部长回答“华人不热忱!”
当我们要求部长及助理部长申报个人资产时,他们假装没听到。
当我们要求将泛婆公路提升至双程大道时,部长回答说“我们会分阶段做”
当我们期望独中可以得到常年拨款时,他说“教育是联邦课题”
当我们为达雅同胞争取权益的时候,部长回答说“我是达雅人,我知道怎样照顾自己的族群”
当我们说要20%石油开采税时,“我们透过其它计划来分配”
当我们要为经济困境寻求解决方案时,首长的答案是“再生能源走廊”
当我们要求所有政府工程必须通过公开招标程序时,他们却装聋作哑。
当首长说:“他们(反贪污委员会)不值得我合作,因为他们很顽固。。。他们不诚实,”我们知道我们的首长已经是马来西亚最有权势的人。

议长先生,
我们怎样才能真正为砂州带来发展和改革,如果在这议会的部长和助理部长抱着漠不关心的态度拒绝回答问题?我们如何能够拥有一个透明的政府,如果部长和助理部长不申报他们的资产?我们如何能够拥有一个廉洁及有效率的政府,当领导的家属和朋党被分配到政府工程?我们怎样才能消灭贪腐,当反贪污委员会被轻视,他们不敢发言或采取任何行动?
但有一件事情是可以肯定的,马来西亚的政治版图已经出现改变,人们已经看到当中的区别,他们懂得如何运用选票。随着社会的进步及网络媒体延伸到乡区的当儿,改变之风已经吹向砂州和全马各个角落。除非国阵政府把它扣起来,不然的话这股风气将会吹到来届大选。
议长先生,我不会感到恐惧和青睐,我所说的一切都问心无愧。那是我身为人民代议士的责任和义务。我希望所有在这神圣殿堂的州议员们能把个人的利益放在一边,共同为砂州人民谋取利益。

议长先生,谢谢您!願上帝祝福砂勞越和砂州子民!








Wednesday, May 15, 2013

挑起种族间不满情绪 黄培根谴责极端言论


(本报诗巫14日讯)行动党砂州宣传秘书兼柏拉旺区州议员黄培根严厉谴责前上诉庭法官莫哈默诺阿都拉,及玛拉工艺大学名誉副校长阿都拉曼,在一场选后论坛上,发表极端和不负责任的言论。
他认为,他们的言论已经挑起了种族间不满的情绪,如果不加以制止,将可能演变成种族仇恨。届时,大马几十年来好不容易培养起来的种族和谐,将被这些极端种族主义分子毁于一旦。
他发表文告指出,前上诉庭法官莫哈默诺阿都拉在一场由玛拉工艺大学校友会与半岛马来学生联盟所联办题为“后第13届大选检讨会:穆斯林的领导与生存”的论坛上,毫无忌惮的发表极端的种族言论。
由于对于此届大选的成绩感到不满,前上诉庭法官诺阿都拉以警告的方式向华裔表达不满;他表示,随着华裔在大选中背叛马来人,华裔必须准备好面对马来社会的“报仇”。
“华裔背叛了马来人的友谊,这是真的,因为他们在获得经济力量后,还图谋争取政治力量。”
“马来人最忌讳的事情就是被人背叛。一旦马来人被背叛,他们的报仇将永不休止。当马来人被人背叛,就会反弹,而华裔必须承担马来人反弹的后果。”
诺阿都拉也促请各造,废除“华裔”与“印裔”的字眼,以便使用“马来人”与“非马来人”,或者“土著”与“非土著”来取代。

不实指责应受制止

黄培根认为,以上种种言论,试图透过挑起不满的情绪来制造种族间的对抗,这些极端主义分子为了逞英雄而发出不实的指责,类似的行为应该受到制止及对付。
“诺阿都拉强调,土著与非土著之分,诺阿都拉也以背叛的莫须有罪名强加在华裔身上,并且煽动马来人向华裔采取报复行动使国家陷入动乱的局面。不支持就是背叛?要是以这种逻辑来看待大选,倒不如修改宪法,规定非土著没有投票的权利,到时就不会有反国阵政府之说。国阵的地位也因此受到保障,永远得以享有大权。”
“除此之外,玛拉工艺大学名誉副校长阿都拉曼也以国民教育做为课题,来制造种族间的矛盾。他促请政府废除华淡小,改以纯使用马来语为媒介的单元教育取代。这种强迫性的教育制度根本就不符合大马的国情,可是身为玛拉工艺大学名誉副校长的阿都拉曼却发出这种毫不实际的谬论来分化各种族间的友好关系。在大马人民享有自由选择宗教和教育的权利,教育是提供知识的管道,何来教学语言和种族背景之分。况且,在大环境的需求趋势下学习华文教育,已经不只是华裔子弟的专利,做为一名资深的教育者,竟然玩弄这种危险的种族把戏,真是教育界的耻辱。

促请纳吉公开表态

黄培根认为,对于这些极端主义分子种种不负责任的言论已经引起种族间的互相猜疑,身为国阵主席兼首相的纳吉,应该就此事做出公开的表态。
“人民要知道首相是否认同这些极端分子的言论?倘若,不认同首相就应该使用1948年煽动法令第4条文下来对付这些人士。令人感到不解的是,为何一直以来,这些不断破坏大马族群友好关系的极端分子都没有受到对付?这是否意味着国阵政府默许这样的文化继续在国内‘发扬光大’?”
他说,自首相纳吉上台以来,一直打着一个马来西亚的口号,可是在施政及巫统领袖的言论,看来根本就是与一马的理念背道而驶。
“国家选举是全民共同参与的民主活动,如果将此届选举喻为‘华人海啸’,那是不正确,以及不负责任的说法。国阵政府在第13届大选得不到全民的支持,不应该将责任归咎于部分的种族。”
黄培根认为,国阵应该吸取失败的教训,人民会出现史无前例的反弹,那是因为政府本身的施政偏差和贪污腐败所致。倘若,国阵要重新得到人民的信任就必须以平等,透明及有效率的方式来实行国家政策,而不是继续以土著与非土著来区分人民所得的利益。
“另外,前首相敦马哈迪也在投票日后发出‘华人拒绝马来人友谊之手’及‘马来人成为本土乞丐’的言论。身为国家领导级人物的前首相,竟然不顾及国家民族间的和谐,还发表如此严重误导及煽动性的言论,这种掀风作浪的极端领袖的行为,应该受到对付。大马会逐步陷入种族两极化的局面,前首相马哈迪应该负起绝大部分的责任。”
黄培根认为,针对这等关系,华裔人民切身利益的问题,在朝的华基政党务必站在最前线,公开谴责这种极端种族主义的言论,并且施压要求执法单位动用法令将肇事者绳之以法。
他说,大马是一个多元种族的国家,无论是那一个政党执政都必须采取中庸的治国纲领来确保每个族群都能享有公平,平等的机会和权益。唯有缔造一个真正属于马来西亚人的马来西亚,才能保持各种族间的互相尊重与和谐。

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

2013年砂州立法议会第一季会议10道提问


1)      To ask the Chief Minister (Written reply)
a)      How many illegal foreigners are there in Sarawak?
b)      What steps have been taken to make sure that the incident like the Sulu instruction in Sabah  will not happen to Sarawak?
2)      To ask the Chief Minister (Written reply)
a)      Please list in details the cost of the construction including the market value of the land of the University College of Technology Sarawak,
b)      Is it a public or a private college?
c)       Please list the tuition fees for all the courses it offers.
3)       To ask the Minister of Local Government and Community Development (Written reply)
a)       When would Sibu attain the status of a city?
b)      What are the reasons for its failure to attain the city status till now?
c)      What steps have been taken to achieve its goals of attaining the city status,and when?
4)      To ask the Chief Minister (Oral reply)
         Why Sarawak cannot compete with Penang now and has to wait until 2030 to surpass Penang?
5)      To ask the Minister of Local Government and Community Development to state the steps that had been taken     
         to make Sibu a safe and green city/town? (Oral reply)
6)      To ask the Minister of Infrastructure Development and Communication (Written reply)
a) Whether the government has any intention of providing free Wi-Fi services to all Sarawakian? If no, why?
b) How many households in Sarawak are still without fixed-line telephone services by Telekom?
c) Can the government fix a ceiling price for the streamyx services provided by Telekom? If no, why?
7)      To ask the Chief Minister (Written reply)
a)       What is the total number of households in Sarawak?
b)      How many households in Sarawak have the monthly incomes of RM 3000 and above?
c)       How many households have less than RM 1500 monthly incomes?
8)      To ask the Minister of Welfare, Women and Family Development (Written reply)
a)       Please list the number of single parent families and the handicapped persons in the state,
b)      What kinds of aids are been given to (a) above-mentioned?
c)       What was the total amount of aids given out each year by the state government to (a) above-mentioned?
d)      There are many complaints of delay by the social welfare department in giving out aids to these less privileged groups, what plans have been taken by the Ministry to avoid their reoccurrences?
9)      To ask the Minister of Housing and Tourism (Written reply)
a)       List the number of  houses in all the respective divisions in Sarawak that are still without Firewalls ,Occupation permit and Land Title respectively,
b)      What steps are been taken to make sure that these properties in (a) above will eventually be given Occupation permit and land title?
c)       When will the Housing Developers (Control & Licensing) Ordinance, 1993 be amended to tackle the weaknesses of the Ordinance such as enforcements and penalties for the offenders?
10)   To ask the minister of Local Government and Community Development (written reply)
a)       When will the government solve the problem of  insufficient street lighting along Ulu Sg. Merah and Jalan Tun Ahmad Zaidi Adruce in Sibu?
b)      What steps are been taken to solve the drainage problems of Jalan Gelama, Lorong Belibas and Lorong Teku 53, 57 and their surrounding areas?
c)       Many drains in the residential areas in the state constituency of Pelawan are not functioning, what steps are been taken to address this pressing issue?

1)      请问首席部长(书面答复)
a)      砂州有多少非法外劳?
b)      有什么防范措施来确保苏禄军事件不会发生在砂州?
2)      请问首席部长(书面答复)
a)      请详细列明砂州政府用于成立科技大学学院的所有费用。
b)      那是一所国立或私立大学学院?
c)       有多少项课程将在第一年开课?
d)      请列出所有课程的学费
3)      请问地方政府及社区发展部部长(书面答复)
a)      诗巫将在何时升格为市?
b)      未能升格为市的原因是什么?
c)       即将采取什么样的步骤来达致升格为市的目标?
4)      请问首席部长(口头答复)
  为何砂州必须等到2030年才能超越槟城?
5)      请问地方政府及社区发展部部长(口头答复)
请列出所采取的步骤使诗巫转变成一个安全及绿化的城镇
6)      请问基本设施及通讯部长(书面答复)
a)      州政府是否有意提供免费无线上网服务给砂州人民使用?如不,为什么?
b)      砂州有多少个家庭依然没有马电讯所提供的固定电话线服务?
c)       政府是否可以限定马电讯网络服务收费的最高限价?如不,为什么?
7)      请问首席部长(书面答复)
a)      砂州共有多少个家庭?
b)      有多少个家庭每月收入拥有3000令吉或以上?
c)       有多少个家庭每月收入少过1500令吉?
8)      请问福利,妇女及家庭发展部长(书面答复)
a)      请列出州内单亲妈妈和残障人士的人数
b)      提供什么样形式的援助给予(a)以上提及的人士?
c)       州政府每年共拨出多少援助金来协助(a)以上提及的人数?
d)      许多投诉关于福利部延误发放援助金予弱势群体的事件,福利部将采取什么样的措施以避免类似事件继续发生?
9)      请问房屋及旅游部长(书面答复)
a)      请列出州内各地区房子没有防火墙,入伙准证和地契的数目。
b)      政府将采取什么样的措施来确保以上所提及的产业最终可以获得入伙准证和地契?
c)      何时修改出现弱点的房屋发展商(管制及执照)条例,1993?如用于执法和处罚违法者的缺 陷。
10)   请问地方政府及社区发展部部长 (书面答复)
a)      州政府将在什么时候解决乌鲁顺溪美拉路及敦阿曼再迪阿都斯路路灯不足的问题?
b)      采取什么措施来解决格拉麻路,柏利巴斯路,德古5357巷及附近地区的排水系统的缺陷?
c)       在柏拉旺州选区里许多住宅区面对排水系统无法操作的问题,有什么措施来解决这项急需解决的问题?
     
      
            

DAVID WONG'S BLOG

MOUTH PIECE 4 SARAWAKIAN

Blog Archive

Labels