Sunday, September 7, 2008

一句道歉就解决问题了吗? 华社和非土族就满意了吗?

一句道歉就解决问题了吗? 华社和非土族就满意了吗?
比起早前促阿末依斯迈公开道歉的态度,首相阿都拉在槟州全体13巫统区部于昨日力挺阿末依斯迈后,今日的立场明显软化,虽然没有力挺阿末依斯迈,但是却接受其“阐述史实”的解释。阿都拉不仅未再提及道歉一事,反将矛头指向媒体,要求切莫再渲染种族课题。

我 们 应 该 用 另 一 种 角 度 去 看 整 个“华人寄居论”
阿末依斯迈是代表巫统和国阵, 他的言论代表了马国阵政府的种族政策和它们的心态。一句道歉就可解决多年一句话就可以解决国家51年来不公平,不平等,不民主 的种族的政策?一句道歉 就可解决多年以来的不平等的协商和政策?

结 语
我们的国家,我们的下一代,将何去何从?人民应该用宏愿的眼光和本身的知慧来决定我国家的前途。 我们应全力围剿阿末和跟他有挂钩的政客和政党!

10 comments:

思想决定未来 said...

来自在《当今大马》报道

若无法扮演“有意义角色”
许子根:民政退出国阵!


我仔细读了读这篇报道后,一个词出现在我的脑中-“鸡肋”。

首先在此向大家解释一下"鸡肋"这个典故。

《三国演义》第七十二回 诸葛亮智取汉中 曹阿瞒兵退斜谷中,曹操正在进退两难之际,适庖官进鸡汤。操见碗中有鸡肋,因而有感于怀。正沉吟间,夏侯敦入帐,禀请夜间口号。操随口曰:“鸡肋!鸡肋!”敦传令众官,都称“鸡肋”。行军主簿杨修,见传“鸡肋”二字,便教随行军士,各收拾行装,准备归程。有人报知夏侯敦。敦大惊,遂请杨修至帐中问曰:“公何收拾行装?”修曰:“以今夜号令,便知魏王不日将退兵归也:鸡肋者,食之无肉,弃之有味。今进不能胜,退恐人笑,在此无益,不如早归:来日魏王必班师矣。故先收拾行装,免得临行慌乱。”

即比喻做无多大意义而又不忍舍弃的事情。

现在民政党所在国阵的地位正好与这“鸡肋”相同,继续呆着,没太多意义,连发表“华人寄居论”的阿末依斯迈日前召开记者会声称,若民政党要退出国阵,就悉随尊便。我国首相,副首相也没对他的言论作出相关的惩罚
措施。唉!混到这种地步也挺悲哀的。

但是又不敢轻易丢掉这块鸡肋,一应是因为害怕前途漫漫吧!二又害怕马华将好处给占了去吧!

此党何去何从,全在一念之中。我个人认为做一次英雄又何妨,人生在世,就那么几十年,
总要做一次让自已自豪的事情,到老了,也有一个好的回忆....坚持做一次自已,做一次坚持真理的事情。


lily

思想决定未来 said...

您好

您说的对,但是首先要让他向我们全部的华人族道歉,这是最起码的。

道完歉后,然后再慢慢找他算账,如让他解释此为个人问题,还是上阶默许他这么做的....

他要一天不道歉,一天骂死他,华人族在马来西亚占35%,怕他吗?并且将国阵一起骂了,上梁不正,下梁歪,无能,最好早下台,回家种地了。

惨了,一淑女骂粗话了。

lily

David Wong's blog said...

You have been very nice and polite to decribe the Chicken Wings' phenomenon.

The politics is more like an old under wear, stained with dirt and blood. Our democracy has been "raped" by the politicians to fulfill their lust without considering the effects of their actions.

Those who hold high post are rewarded handsomely through their positions and they are like the "fleas" which live the blood on human beings. They can't survive on their owns.

BN is a "fleabag" that is flea-ridden by the politicians. The fleas would not leave as long as the fleabag is not dry yet. The only way to rid of the fleas is to get rid of the fleabag, i.e the BN.

Ahmadgate is just an example of the "fleabag" phenomenon. Who is Ahmad? I guess we all know the answer. Then the question boils down to who is Abdullah and Najib? The answers lie in your head, don't they?

There is no better way to describe the BN than a "fleabag" and the politicians as the fleas. So do we need the fleas to apologise to us? Would a flea apologises to the dog?

Regards,
DW

思想决定未来 said...

您好

我刚也在一年青人的BLOG里写了,国阵好比是一张被涂得面目全非的画了,无法使得变得漂亮的,要能改造好,早就改好了,还会等到今天吗?

民联是一幅新画,还没有被涂黑,可能会有很多空白的地方,但是它还是可以画出一幅好画的。

因此我们一致都在支持民联,现国阵用的一些办法来阻止安华变天,让人觉得它未战就先败了,唉!~愚蠢加无能,怎么会领导全马来西亚。

因此请您们加油,我们也在加油,为了马来西亚的明天更美好。

lily

思想决定未来 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
思想决定未来 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
思想决定未来 said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
David Wong's blog said...

Done as per request! I have delected the post although i feel that what you have commented were fact and the actual truth regarding the subject matters.

Thanks and looking forward to see your comment again.

Wong Ho Leng said...

David, by this phrase, "So do we need the fleas to apologise to us? Would a flea apologises to the dog?", you are equating "us" to dogs. That cannot be right.

David Wong's blog said...

Ho Leng, figure of speech only. Anyway, wasn't there a phrase that say the oppositions are the "watch dogs"?

We know who we are, at least we are not the fleas of the society.

DAVID WONG'S BLOG

MOUTH PIECE 4 SARAWAKIAN

Blog Archive

Labels