Thursday, September 27, 2007

Who is the Supreme Judge of the country?



Don’t fall for the ploy by the opposition to create distrust and erode public confidence in the judiciary, says the de facto law minister Nazri Aziz

‘What crisis? I don’t see any’, said Nari. In Malaysia, the question as who is the Supreme Judge who sits on top of the Chief Justice of the Federal court is now being asked. The Malaysian's judicial crisis was started by Dr. M in the Tun Abbas' case and now sealed in the coffin by Nazri Aziz in the Lingam's case.

No explanation and commission can reinstate the credibility and independence of the Malaysian Judicial systm and all the thanks go to the BN. The Lingam case is even worst than the Watergate as the later only affect the election of the US president while the former was like "raping the whole Judicial system of the country in broad daylight."

Now, the Bar council went to the street in defence of the honor of the country's judicail system but i question the outcomes of the march. The BN will not even allow this issue to be debated in the Parliament as the de facto law minister said that
would violate the independence of the judiciary. But the independence of the judiciary was not violated when the CJ reported the Lingam case to the minister, what a bunch of jokers they were.

The whole episode led us asking "who is the supreme Judge of the country?" I guess we all know who he is,don't we? In the coming general election, let all of us be the real judges of the country!

David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity sec.,
27-09-2007z

Let all of us be the judges for the sake of Malaysia!


Below is a good article that many Malaysian would not even care to take a glance at. The article reveals the state of the affair of the country under the BN and the roles of the opposition in checking the abuse by the BN. In particular, the remark by Dr. M about the BN's absolute strength and "we need more opposition MPs."

The sad thing about us if we do not even bother to care about what is happening to our country, auditor-general report for 2006 released recently actually did not reach the majority of the Malaysian although the major newspapers did a wonderful job in publishing the news prominently.

What happened to us? Are we becoming the living dead? Or have the BN casted the magic spell on us to make us "dumb, deaf and blind?" The auditor-general report is only as good as the people's mentality and the opposition is only as good as the people of the country.

The famous saying "you are what you eat!" is good to describe our government, the opposition and the country. It is the people that has the final say and we, my fellow comrades, should take our little first steps to make the BN and even the opposition responsible for their actions.

David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity sec.,
27-09-2007




民主需要反对党 作者:陈建和

副首相纳吉说,我国仅需国阵政府领导万众子民迈向繁荣与安宁的国度,并不需要反对党的协助或领导。这话并不中肯,民主需要强而有力的反对党 ,监督及制衡政府,防止权力造成权力的腐化。

艺术、文化与文物部长莱士雅丁说,在一个民主制度的国家,国会须要有反对党的存在,在先进国家都是如此,绝不是存有煽动性元素。在任何民主的国家,都会有贪污腐化的问题,反对党负起监督贪污、腐败的行为,质问政府机构的各种弊端,担任促进发展的角色 。

大马在2006年的贪污调查指数再次下跌,造成我国在国际社会上的廉政形象深受打击,首相署部长纳兹里说。贪污是“前朝政府”累积下来的问题,在前首相的时代已经严重。我国有官方机密法令、印刷及出版法令的箝制,反对党及媒体难以发挥监督作用,或许如此,我国在贪污调查指数

当年行动党国会议员黄朱强在国会里询问吉隆坡市长买车没有经过批准,首相署部长回答有,英文报访问国库局长,答案是没有,结果吉隆坡市长辞职,以超过市价购买的豪华汽车被拍卖,损失了纳税人一大笔金钱。从这一事例可看出反对党可协助监督腐败的行为。

敦马哈迪在退位后,却说国阵在国会享有的92%多数议席是太强了,并对民主构成严重的威胁。他相信大马必须拥有一个强大的政府,但不是过于强大,当他在位时,国阵所赢得的三分之二议席已足够了,超过90%的议席则是过于强大。他也说:“我们需要足够的反对党议员。”

敦马又说,如果政府在执政上犯错,需要反对党的提醒,纠正可能出现的错误,否则让人以为所有事情都是正确无误的。他以前做任何事若无法决定时,经常等待林吉祥的反应,如果林吉祥说好,他便开始做。

敦马还说,城市华人选民认为他们需要反对党为他们争取权益,希望通过反对党为他们伸张华人课题。

政治人物不在其位后,才看得清事实,看得更透彻,并说公道话,不但发人深省,而且令人感触良多。

Sunday, September 23, 2007

"My Song"


(I sang this song at last night DAP's organised MoonC)ake festival in Paramount hotel, Sibu amist the laughter of hundreds of people.

The following "song" was composed by myself with the assistance of my party's comrades like Fong PT and Lau Hui Ung.It was not so much a song as i can't even sing in the first place, so i "borrow" the idea and quite a few phases from Namewee's Negarakuku and i have to express my thanks to him or else i would not have any idea at all as to how to compose a song.

The difference between me and Wee is that i am a politician while he is a student and it could be found in the content of Negarakuku and "My Song". Both songs revealed the present state of affair in the country although mine revealed the figures to prove the points in Negarakuku.

"My Song" main theme is the mis-managemnent of the country such as corruption and the BN's race-based policies such as the Ketuanan Melayau and the NEP and the educational policies that not only caused racial tension but also hamper the economy and development of the country.

"My Song" also tell us why we are where we are and how the chinese-based parties like the SUPP and the MCA "kow-tou" or lower themselves and the chinese community that they represented. They 3 main characters were also highlighted in the song and how they bow to the wishes of the UMNO.

"My Song" ends with the call for all the Malaysian to stand up for their own rights and not let the political parties manipulate them into believing that all is fine in the country. My earlier article "There is something rotten in the state of Malaysia" was highlighted as well.The Sarawakian dilemmas were also hightlighted as only a Sarawakian can.

I must say song writting is not an easy job and i am proud that we managed to compose "My Song" within a few hours. We would appreciate if someone with the song-writting background could come forward to refine "My Song" into a real folk song.

Thank you.

David Wong
DAP Sarawak Publicity Secretary
23-09-2007



我爱我的国家
有国才有家,有家才有我
站在这边大声唱歌你麦惊
虽然我每次骂政府
我的歌就像榴莲一样
硬硬尖尖只是
看你敢不敢打开看看里面的真相
它可以很臭也可以很香
只是看你是个怎么样的人

我们的首长叫做白毛
因为他的头发很白
因为他的烦恼很多
不懂得怎么下台

我们的白毛
胜过外国的红毛
因为他是我们的国宝
几十年不能被取代

如果他下台
我们就没有发展
如果他下台
集团就跟着倒台
世界大乱人民怎么办

砂州土地政策
白毛讲了才算
人联只是跟着唱
土地到期还要还钱
25%不够50%不算贵 西北够力

这种政策不需要改善
也不需要修改
白毛西北 Suka

人联白毛同阵线
人民还可靠火箭



我们的国家
Malaysia Boleh 世界第一
因为我们拥有特权
只看你有怎样的肤色
不要怪政府只会照顾土著
不要怪我们没有受到公平的照顾
这是个很好的政策
国民团结就靠特权
513事件不算威胁
马来人富有,华人得利
我们子孙也还有工作
帮他们打工,也可以帮他们数钞票
这种政策我西北Suka
巫统策划人联马华照办
高教部门钱用不完
2万6千幽灵学生可得贷款
国防部门钱花不完
9亿帐单没人管
Audit general 很生气
一年半载找不到
新闻见报就回来

青体部门不会算
5千50一样算
前后部长都赖帐
人民只好自己去埋单

关税部门最先进
3亿系统当垃圾
Port Klang free zone 46亿
国阵政府不在意
反正汽油起了44亿
只望人民不要去注意

华人人口25par
华小拨款3.6par
人联马华扶LP
华文独中西北辛苦
独中文凭政府不要
英国美国随你去
台湾也有黄明志
大学门槛有高低
肤色决定用什么楼梯
华人父母可卖地
如果没钱就放弃
这种现象不要觉得奇怪
因为这样反而表现我们的厉害

人联马华自称龙
国会殿堂应声虫
自我矮化不能讲
民族权益不敢讲
政府舞弊不会讲
这些政党西北可爱
选举一到就派糖果
党内斗争只为自己
不要怪他们没有志气
不要怪他们没有照顾华人的权益
只因为他们要升官发财

这首歌虽然我唱到走声
虽然我有时还唱到破声
我的声音有点像公鸡
这样我们才可以醒过来
如果我们继续支持国阵
就不要怪政府只有照顾土著
也不要怪我们没有受到公平的照顾

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Chinese "sleeping dolls" from China caught in Sibu for engaging in the sex trade

The following news article from Sin Chew Jit Poh on the 20th of September 2007 confirmed my earlier article "Please respect and honor the good name of China" on this blog which i said "There are hundreds of these (sleeping dolls) in Sibu, Sarawak and yet the government is not doing anything about it."

Sometimes the authorities concerned simply ignore the problems although they might have knowledge and informations about the activities of these illegal "tourists". The immigration department should cooperate with the law enforcement units to check the alarming trend of the social problems brought about by these sleeping dolls.


宅變淫窟 車座當陽台
公眾爆料龍女落網

updated:2007-09-20 07:31:54 MYT


(詩巫19日訊)中國女郎到詩巫假旅行真賣淫?詩巫警方在兩天的掃黃行動中,扣捕4名中國女子及起獲3盒安全套。

警方是接到公眾的情報,于本月16及18日,相隔兩天內展開突檢行動,在德古路美景花園及英雄路的兩間民宅內扣查4名中國女郎。


警方懷疑落網的4名中國女子,是以旅行證件進入本地假旅行真賣淫。她們平時都在所居住的民宅裡接客,偶爾應電召外出賣淫,而交易地點各異,如酒店和顧客住處,甚至在車上速戰速決。

一般上,中國女郎在本地的“市價”介于150至300令吉不等,嫖客多是年輕人,不過也有銀髮一族找她們進行性交易。

16日下午2時,警隊突檢美景花園一間屋子,在屋里發現兩名年輕貌美的中國女子。警員還在房間內搜出1大2小盒的安全套。

警方懷疑有關安全套是2女在與顧客進行性交易時使用,因此警方把2女押走時,亦將安全套帶回警署充證物調查。

之後,即18日下午一時許,警方同樣接到公眾的情報,突擊英雄路一間屋子,并在屋里逮捕兩名頗具姿色的中國女郎。

Monday, September 17, 2007

Please respect and honor the good name of China!




I just hung up a call from a young lady who has a distinct assent of the Mainland China. It was another cone-job at work but I did not give her the time to finish off her “sales-call”.

She was worst than a hooker in actual fact, at least certain hookers would still protect the good name of their country by disguising their nationality and many do not feel that they literally cone (although they do solicit) someone into having illicit sex with them. I believe many hookers still have some shame and dignity left in them if compared to these cone women.

It is a shame that while the world looks up to the Chinese in culture, arts, literatures and many other fields, they are some of those who would smear the good name of their race and their country for their own greed and lust. Many of them operate in Malaysia and their targets are all Malaysian Chinese. News reported that many of the victims are senior citizen and those less educated sectors of the society and these have caused much outrage in the general public. Many of my friends and family members were their targets as well and they really are unimpressed by their “cousins” from China.

Malaysian immigration department and their counterparts in the police force are not doing much at all to crack down on many of these who entered as “tourist” but are actually engaged in the sex industry or selling pirating software and CD in the market. There are hundreds of these in Sibu, Sarawak and yet the government is not doing anything about it. Our DAP state assemblyman for Kidurong had in 2006 raised the issue of the Chinese “sleeping doll” in the state assembly and we have proof that there were some who entered as “foreign students” but are actually call girls who were sponsored by their rich “uncles” here. We received some heart-broken housewives who complaint that their husbands are these “uncles” and how their families were ruined by the “sleeping dolls”.

Malaysian welcomes any tourist from any country but let them know that the laws do not allow them to violate the terms and conditions of their stay in the country.

Half-way through this article, another young Chinese lady called again and I told her “please do not insult yourself and smear the name of your country, even your Chairman Mao would rise from below if he knows about what you are doing”. She hung up and I hope I will not hear another kind of this call again.

David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity sec.,
17-09-2007

Sunday, September 16, 2007

RM 200 million, where they went?

Friday September 14, 2007
Sarawak should explain extra RM200m spent, says DAP

MIRI: Sarawak DAP wants the state government to give a detailed financial breakdown on why some RM200mil in extra expenditures had been paid to construct 384 temporary bridges in Sarawak.

State DAP Information Chief David Wong said the Federal Government must also provide a satisfactory answer to this "fiasco" in Sarawak.
"We are talking about wastages amounting to RM200mil, and for the replacement of the temporary bridges. The public have a right to know what had actually happened.
"It is not good enough for an auditor-general's report to be published and then for the matter to be eventually forgotten.

"That has happened many times before. But this time, the amount is too huge to be simply forgotten. The people in Sarawak deserve some good answers," Wong said on Friday.

Auditor-General Tan Sri Ambrin Buang in his recent report to the Dewan Rakyat said that "the lack of detailed preliminary studies" was the reason why the construction costs to replace the 384 bridges out of the 570 bridges in Sarawak had risen from RM551.02mil to RM741.2mil.

Sarawak Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri Alfred Jabu on Thursday said in Kuching that if such problems arose because of faults by the state Public Works Department (JKR) then he would rectify it, but added that many such projects are under federal jurisdiction.

Wong yesterday described Jabu's reply as "flimsy and shallow".
"Such a reply is totally unacceptable. The state government and the Federal Government must furnish a detailed breakdown on what happened to the extra RM200mil that was used up.

"To which company was the extra amount paid, for which projects, what was the initial cost, what was the increase and why was there such an increase?
"The state government cannot simply push the blame to the federal side. Both the state and federal governments must be held accountable and both are answerable to the people of Sarawak," he stressed.

Wong said Sarawak DAP wants an independent commission to be set up to investigate such misuse of funds in the state, adding that the opposition parties want to be in the commission. He further stressed that the DAP state assembly members will bring this topic into the DUN when it meets in November this year.

The people in Sarawak will be very disappointed if no proper action were taken to penalise those guilty of mismanagement or hiking up the costs of such projects, he said.

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

scandal after scandal-the BN ways

非公民获教育贷款 黄培根促政府彻查
(本报诗巫11日讯)在2006年稽查司报告中竟然出现2万6000非公民可获得教育贷款,砂州民主行动党宣传秘书黄培根促请政府公布有关人士名单与种族比例。
今天在一项新闻发布会上,他说,有关贷款只限马来西亚人受惠,即使是永久居民也不符合资格,有关单位以国籍出现问题来推搪责任是完全不成理由的。
他问,既然有关贷学金只供国人申请,又为什么要设有国籍这个栏目?
他强调,指学生填错表格是一种非常不负责的说法,也证明有关单位在事件被揭发之后,并没有认真的去处理,企图置身事外。他说,政府亦应该公布,2万6000名非公民到底贷出了多少的人民纳税钱。
黄培根亦大事非议文青体育部以5700令吉购买价值仅50令吉文具的丑闻。 有关事件导致政府多付了1080万令吉。
另外,关税局花费4亿5000万令吉重新聘请一间公司设计新的系统亦受到他的鞭鞑。
关税局钜款设系统
黄培根说,关税局刚花费了2亿9000万令吉设置了一个新系统之后不久,又花钜款设新系统,政府须公布有关详情。
他说,政府应该要妥善的管理人民的纳税钱,而不是让贪污与舞弊者成为最大的受益者。
他表示,唯有好的施政方案,才能够让政府的拨款达致最高的功能,不然,1700多亿的预算案,若是还是发生类似上述的舞弊事件,真正用在造福人民的数目恐怕只有半数而已。
他说,在事件发生之后,副首相仅指示有关部门作出解释是错误的行动,政府应该立刻成立特殊调查委员会,委任朝野政党、反贪污局及稽查局等为成员,展开调查工作,并直接向国会负责。
他形容只有解释是没有意义的,也不能够让人民信服。

Check UMNO in the Parliament(in Chinese text)

火箭要从人联党手中,拿下诗巫及南兰议席

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  (诗巫11日讯)民主行动党砂州宣传秘书黄培根放话,要从人联党手中拿下诗巫及南兰2个国会议席。

  在人联党诗巫支部矢言在来届国会选举捍卫诗巫及南兰2个国会选区,确保拿督刘会洲及拿督张泰卿中选续任的同时,火箭领袖今天在新闻会上扬言,已经下定决心要拿下该两个议席。

  他说,民主行动党不是要与人联党“抢”议席,也不是为了反对党本身,而是要代表全国的华裔选民,制衡巫统在国会里的霸权,真正的把华人心声带进国会里。

  黄培根也说,作为国阵里的华基政党,人联党已经在国阵里失去了代表性和地位,也造成华人的权益与受尊重地位日渐式微。

  在新闻会上,黄培根更是满怀信心的表示,要拿下民主行动党在砂州攻打的所有议席。

  民主行动党初步圈定在10个国会选区参选,其中7个肯定上阵的选区是以华裔选民占多数的选区,即诗巫、南兰、古晋、实淡宾、美里、民都鲁、泗里街;其他3区是混合区,2个在砂中区,1个在南区。

  “不过,如果其他反对党在3个混合区有更大胜算的话,民主行动党会让出选区。”他补充。

  黄培根不讳言,在国会选举中,民主行动党将继续提出土地课题,并坚持要求砂州政府修改土地法令,希望人民给予火箭支持力量。

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Wayang Kulit of the BN?


BN's Wayang-kulit (puppet show in English)?
Live bullet fired at angry ceramah crowd


Terengganu police chief Ayub Yaakob, had confirmed that one live bullet was fired by one of his officers as opposition parties PAS and PKR are claiming that the police used unprecedented violence - including firing live bullets - to disperse a ceramah in Pantai Batu Buruk, Terengganu, late last night. Two were injured in that incident and 23 arrested.

The above shows how far we have come after we have gained our Merdeka. The Malaysian government had always ruled with the iron-fist and had passed many inhumane and undemocratic Acts since Merdeka, especially after the May 13 incident in 1969. We gained our independence from the Briton but lost our freedom to our owned elected government?

Ceramah is the Malay word for the assembly of people normally associated with political events like campaign speeches, and Malaysian law made it illegal for the assembly without the police permit. Under the Malaysian law, any group of 4 people or more could be charged for illegal gathering without a valid police permit!

The human rights group and other NGOs and the opposition accused the BN of playing the “kulit Wayang” in the incident as the Police should have rejected the application for public gathering immediately so as to give the organizing committee sufficient time to respond. Under the normal circumstances, the organizing committee would presume that the police have no objection if it did not receive any news 24 hours prior to the public gathering.In any case,the police authority in a democratic country would normally not unreasonably refuse the rights of the freedom of assembly. Furthermore, water cannon and rubber bullet and crowd-dispersing tear gas would be utilized and certainly NO LIVE BULLET is to be used in a case like that.

There is something sinister in the whole episode of police brutality seen in PantaiBatuBuruk,Terengganu. There seems to be a dark hand and the opposition has every reason to suspect that the BN is the mastermind behind it.With the approaching election, the BN's propogandas would be all out to discredit the oppostion and at the same time instill fear into the hearts of peace-loving Malaysian. The SUPP had in 2001 Sarawak state election used the same tactic by putting pictures of the Indonesian riots and the terrorist attack of the 9/11 in the mainstream print media to their advantage.

Malaysian should do some hard thinking and soul-searching as to why we lost the basic human rights in our own country, more so when the government of the day was elected by our own rakyat. Like I had earlier said “ Independence means more than shouting slogans or playing lips services and patriotism is more than flag waving on the street tonight or joins the parades at the Merdeka stadium. It means liberty to search for equal opportunity and happiness, freedom to speak out for our rights, daring to take the political reform necessary and equality for every Malaysian.”

Friday, September 7, 2007

The Parliament-the Rubber Stamp of the BN





The rubber stamp in the name of “The Parliament”

The Dewan Rakyat or the Hall of the peoples in English is the highest law making body in the country and it is supposed to supervise the executive branch of the governments. Anything that is of importance to the people should be debated in the Dewan Rakyat so that the people and their representatives in the house would be able to voice their opinion and address the issues in the spirit of democracy. The executive branch should not be in control of the Dewan Rakyat or else the separation of powers in the 3 branches (legislative, executive and judicial) of the government would be in jeopardy and the people and the country would be subjected to the winch and fancy of the executive branch; which is exactly the case in Malaysia.

When Tun Mahartir was in power, the judicial branch of the government basically lost its independent when the then Lord President was dismissed. That would be the darkest day of the judicial in Malaysia and Malaysia was under labeled as a country whereby democracy is simply a phase and nothing in essence.

Our elected representatives have a duty to turn the Dewan rakyat into a true “Hall of the people” and not the rubber stamp of the BN. However, since the formation of the country, the country has been governed by the BN alone and its grip on the parliament has become stronger by the years through various means. The 2004 general election saw the BN controls more than 91% of the Dewan Rakyat and that have led to the most powerful BN at the expense of the country and the peoples. Since the PM, Abdullah came to power, the corruption index of the country has turned for the worse and the country has become less transparence as per Transparency International’s standard.

With the 91% mandate it received in 2004, the BN administration has become un-checkable and its dominant coalition partner, the UMNO, has become more authoritative in its push for the NEP and even challenging the Constitutions of the country when its leaders announced and reaffirmed that Malaysia is an Islamic state. Some UMNO leaders even challenged the Chinese to “return” to China in the parliament and used it as a butcher house when cows were slaughter in its compound to celebrate the second marriage of the PM, Abdullah.

When the PKFZ (Port Klang Free Zone) scandal was brought up by the opposition leader in the Parliament, Mr. Lim Kit Siang , the speaker of the Dewan Rakyat refused an emergency debate because “the government is looking into it”. What a joke has the BN turns the parliament into? How would the people put their trust in the parliament to protect their interest? YB or Yang Berhormat (Honorable or respected member) has been labeled by the people on the streets as Yang Bodor (idiot) or Yang Buaya (corrupted), which is not only an insult to the MPs but to the Parliament and to the country.

The country has just celebrated its 50th Merdeka, it is still in its infancy stage of development as a country. The Malaysian regardless of their race, cultural or religious background must face the truce, that this country’s future hangs not only in the balance of the division and separation of powers not only in the 3 branches of the government but also a more equable balance of political power between the BN and the opposition.

David Wong
DAP Sarawak Publicity Secretary
07-09-2007





Below is reported by Malaysiakini for your reading pleasure;

A government backbencher today suggested that the Parliament is relocated to Putrajaya, the seat of the government administration.

"We need a bigger and more comfortable Parliament. We should just relocate our Parliament to Putrajaya," said Badruddin Amiruldin (BN-Jerai).

"Our Parliament is just a tall rectangular building. I understand that in the past we had no money to get a better building, but now we have plenty of money and we should build a more beautiful building in a better place."
Where the Parliament is located is not important, but we have to ensure that it is on par with the judiciary and executive," he added.


" Explaining that the Parliament was now under the tight control of executive, Wan Junaidi (photo) called for the Parliamentary Services Act to be reviewed.

He said that the Parliament needed to get out Ministry of Finance's control and has its own budget and allocations, like how it was before the Act was abolished in 1992.

Sunday, September 2, 2007

There is something rotten in the state of Malaysia?




馬哈迪:非馬來人不滿
“新經濟政策濫用”

馬哈迪接受財經週刊《TheEdge》專訪時,被詢及如何克服新經濟政策遭到濫用的問題時,他說,政府無法說,立即停止落實有關政策。

“我一直呼吁馬來人努力工作,不要依賴新經濟政策。是有人聽我的話,但大部份人還是不理會。”詢及他自認的最大失敗時,馬哈迪說,他無法改變馬來人的思維。

The NEP or New economy policy is actually the “Never Ending Policy” under the BN; Dr. M knows that the majority of the Malays would never be willing to forgo the special privileges that the BN started in the 70s. He also knows that any UMNO president would not be able to really abolish the NEP although officially it has ceded to exist, as that would be political suicide for him. Even an authoritarian leader like the dear Dr. who has ruled Malaysia for 22 years can’t openly defy the majority of the Malays.

Dr. M also knew that the ruling Umno and its leaders (at the expense of the non-bumi) have abused the NEP as I quote him when he talked about the Aps that was created under the NEP “這不是新經濟政策,而是濫用新經濟政策!”

We do not have to doubt his view that the BN has abused the affirmative action plan since then and majority of the bumi are unhappy that the NEP actually enriches only those well connected. We can talk to the cab drivers in KL and they would tell us that they did not benefited under the BN’s policies and that only a few BN men controlled the licenses of the taxis in KL.

However, the culture of the Malays does not allow them to question the views of those in control and they are basically very trusting people. They are the victim of the political party and their leaders because they would never be able to face the globalization like what Freidman described in his book “The world is flat.”

Dr. M had on the 15th August 2007 borrowed the phrase from Shakespeare's Hamlet 's to describe Malaysia's current state of affairs which i think is most fitting;"Something is rotten in the state of Denmark”

David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity secretary
02/09/2007

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Where is my birthday present?


“It’s my 44th birthday, where is my present?” Sarawak asked. Sarawak has been asking the same questioned since 16th September 1963 and no reply came from the federal government and through its cronies in the Sarawak government, the question has been depressed for the last 44 years.

As the BN government prepares to launch its 50th Merdeka, it forgot the history of the formation of the country, namely Malaysia, or else it should really celebrate our 44th birthday as a nation. History pointed out that the Malay Federation achieved its independent on the 31st of August 1957 without Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore.

Tunku Abdul Rahman then called for the formation of a bigger Malaya in Singapore in 1961, which eventually led to the formation of Malaysia. On the 16th September1963 Sarawak, Sabah, Singapore and the Malay Federation formed a new entity, and Malaysia was born. We did not join the Malay Federation and thus we are of equal partners on equal footing. However, it was not so as the federal treats Sarawak as the lesser brother and it has since been left far behind in term of development and opportunities. Let us take a comparison between Sarawak and the peninsular, nobody would question that we are some 20 years behind in term of development.

It is important to put history right on what was distorted by certain groups as history would put everything into the right prospective, including the Sarawak identity and what it truly deserve. Thus the question “where is my birthday present?” Some might ask, “why asking for the present?” The answer lies in the heart of most Sarawakian as we felt that we have been treated like the “adopted sons” and since we can’t demand and we can’t threaten, than at least we can beg or may be we even lost the right to beg?

Independence means more than shouting slogans or playing lips services and patriotism is more than flag waving on the street tonight or joins the parades at the Merdeka stadium. It means liberty to search for equal opportunity and happiness, freedom to speak out for our rights, daring to take the political reform necessary and equality for every Malaysian. Let all of us be the “prince” or “princess” of this land and let nobody subject to any kind of discrimination. All of us can play a part in taking this country to a greater height and let our Jalur Gemilang(national flag)fly high not only on the lamp post or poles or buildings but also in the heart of every Malaysian. Then everyone can truly shout “Merdeka! Merdeka! Merdeka!” from the bottom the heart and our forefathers will smile down on us.

David Wong on the eve of the 50th Merdeka
30-08-2007

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Rukunegara or National Principles

Many of the parents saw the Rukunegara at the back cover of our kids exercise books and yet do not "recognise" it at all. The phrases sound so hollow and empty and we thought it was there just for the sake of not leaving the back cover looks empty, well it is time to look at it from the historical prospective. Even the government of the day forgot the third principle of the Rukunagara, the supremacy of the Parliament, as it has turned the Parliament into the rubber stamp of the BN government.

We seldom see important issues being fully discussed in the Parliament, the most recent example was on the 27th August 2007 when the Speaker of the lower house turned down the motion of the opposition leader, Mr. Lim Kit Siang to debate the government's RM 4.6 billion bail-out of the Port Klang Free Zone.

David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity secretary
29-08-2007

Below is from www.referenceencyclopedia.com for your reading pleasure.

The Rukunegara or sometimes Rukun Negara (Malay for "National Principles") is a philosophy and national ideology — the de facto Malaysian pledge of allegiance — was instituted by royal proclamation on Merdeka Day, 1970, in reaction to a serious race riot known as the May 13 Incident which occurred in 1969. The incident proved at that time that Malaysian racial balance and stability was fragile at best. Immediately thereafter, the Malaysian government immediate sought ways to foster unity among Malaysians. One of the methods used to encourage unity is the Rukunegara. The Rukunegara was inspired in part by the Indonesian Pancasila, and like the Pancasila, is based on five guiding principles.

The word Rukunegara can refer to the whole declaration, the words after the preamble (beginning Maka kami...) or the five principles alone.

Malay text
BAHAWASANYA NEGARA KITA MALAYSIA mendukung cita-cita hendak :

mencapai perpaduan yang lebih erat di kalangan seluruh masyarakatnya ;
memelihara satu cara hidup demokratik ;
mencipta satu masyarakat adil di mana kemakmuran Negara akan dapat dinikmati bersama secara adil dan saksama ;
menjamin satu cara liberal terhadap tradisi-tradisi kebudayaannya yang kaya dan berbagai corak ; dan
membina satu masyarakat progresif yang akan menggunakan sains dan teknologi moden.
MAKA KAMI, rakyat Malaysia, berikrar akan menumpukan seluruh tenaga dan usaha kami untuk mencapai cita-cita tersebut berdasarkan atas prinsip-prinsip berikut :

KEPERCAYAAN KEPADA TUHAN
KESETIAAN KEPADA RAJA DAN NEGARA
KELUHURAN PERLEMBAGAAN
KEDAULATAN UNDANG-UNDANG
KESOPANAN DAN KESUSILAAN

Literal translation
WHEREAS OUR COUNTRY MALAYSIA nurtures the ambitions of:

achieving a more perfect unity amongst the whole of her society;
preserving a democratic way of life;
creating a just society where the prosperity of the country can be enjoyed together in a fair and equitable manner;
guaranteeing a liberal approach towards her rich and varied cultural traditions; and
building a progressive society that will make use of science and modern technology.
NOW THEREFORE WE, the people of Malaysia, pledge to concentrate the whole of our energy and efforts to achieve these ambitions based on the following principles:

BELIEF IN GOD
LOYALTY TO KING AND COUNTRY
THE SUPREMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION
THE RULE OF LAW
COURTESY AND MORALITY

Alternative English version
Our nation, Malaysia, being dedicated :

to achieving a greater unity of all her peoples;
to maintaining a democratic way of life;
to creating a just society in which the wealth of the nation shall be equitably shared;
to ensuring a liberal approach to her rich and diverse cultural traditions;
to building a progressive society which shall be oriented to modern science and technology;
We, her peoples, pledge our united efforts to attain these ends guided by these principles:

BELIEVE IN GOD
LOYALTY TO KING AND COUNTRY
UPHOLDING THE CONSTITUTION
RULE OF LAW
GOOD BEHAVIOUR AND MORALITY

Recitation
It is a norm for primary and secondary public schools in Malaysia to recite the pledge weekly during a compulsory assembly. Pledge reading follows immediately after the singing of the Malaysian national anthem, Negaraku. Of some interest, the Rukun Negara could usually be found behind the cover of every exercise book that is typically used by primary and secondary Malaysian public school students. This is primarily a move recognised to have been formulated to emulate the similar tactic introduced by the Singapore government immediately after her departure from the Malaysian Federation in 1965.

Recently on December 8, 2005, the Malaysian government has made reading of the pledge as a must at every official function. The announcement was made a few months after the government made singing of the national anthem as compulsory at every official function. (Bernama)

Monday, August 27, 2007

Be our own masters in Sarawak, fight for our land


Photo above showed DAP's land issue signature campaign in the remote district of Durin.

DAP Sarawak urge the SUPP and the state BN government to stop fooling the people again about their rights to properties ownership. The new policies announced are not only unfair, unjust and unethical but outright outrageous in every sense.

Sarawak people deserve better! We deserve to be treated as the true masters of Sarawak and truly be treated as such. We are not begging for our own rights but demand that such rights be honored by the government that was put in place by the people. As the government is by the people, it has to be of the people and for the people. Our CM and his cabinet have to understand that we are living in a democratic country and they were elected to serve the people and the state and not the other way round.

The basic rights of all Sarawakian have to start from property’s ownership as the land is our “roots”, without true ownership, how could we call ourselves the masters of Sarawak. How could we call ourselves Sarawakian if we can’t even able to defend our properties against the policies of our elected government?

We do not want any nonsense policies that treated us as fool. The voice of the people have to be heard and they are all crying out “NO” very loudly to the new land policies announced by Sarawak’s second minister of planning and resources, Datuk Sri Awang Tengah on the 26th of May 2007 in Miri.

NO! We do not want and we do not have to “buy” back our own properties after 60 years or 99 years. It is absolutely ridiculous and barbaric for the government to ask the people to buy back what they already “owned”. It is like robbing the people in broad day light.

The DAP stand is very clear and firm, that the Sarawak Land Code must give unconditional and automatic renewal to all the land leases upon their expiry. The 1958 Sarawak Land Code must be amended to protect the rights of properties ownership such as SS. 26-27(renewal and compensation) and SS. 47-48(red line).

The people of Sarawak must stand firm on this issue and must not have any disillusion that the SUPP can stand up for their rights. We must stand united and the ballot papers must be fully utilized to make our stand known. Only through political pressure would be able to see a change in the government’s policies, towards this end, the equation of check and balance is critical.

DAP Sarawak publicity Sec.,
David Wong

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Properties without titles, what happened and who cares?



诗巫松柏西端(PINE SEDUAN)乌也路10里处,拥有二百户已居住7年的居民,至今仍没有获得地契。当地的居民有70%是土著,75%是公务员。他们以辛苦打拼赚得的血汗钱在该住宅区买屋,以为买了个安乐窝,怎知住了7年,却迟迟都无法取得地契。

彼等居住在一个毫无保障的屋檐下,真是欲哭无泪。根据了解土地局是因为该住宅区的沟渠设计不合规格,而拒绝发出地契。松柏西端住宅区的住户,曾在2004年及2005年向地方代议士,部长及土地测量局发表过有关情况,但却都没有得到任何的回应。

众居民在投诉无门的情况下,唯有向行动党求助。行动党在接获投诉后,先后两次前往该住宅区了解实况,并且和当地居民进行交流,寻求对策。在8月20日,住户代表在行动党砂州联委会宣传秘书黄培根及数位党领袖的陪同下前往土地测量局要求发放地契。

行动党希望土地局可以正视此事,早日发放地契,以安民心。毕竟,千错万错不是当地居民的错,而是相关单位行政上的偏差。所以不应该把所有的后果转嫁到无辜买家的身上。

图1.行动党率领居民向当局和国阵人民代议士发出和平请愿

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Towards forming a new government in Sarawak

David Wong’s speech delivered on the 21/12/2006 in the west bank of Sibu at the dinner organized by the DAP’s Sg. Bidut branch. (Certain portion of the speech was not delivered as I have a bad flu that night)

We are here tonight to celebrate the Winter Solstice Festival which symbolized the beginning of winter and time of reunion. Of course when we reunite; we talk about unity and the spirit of sharing and cooperation. This truly represents the spirit of DAP, where the party’s leaders stand in unity with their grassroots and the rakyat in general. Tonight we are here in total unity not only in persons but in the spirit of comradeships and the spirit of Anak Sarawak. There is no power struggle, no back stabbing and no hidden agendas for DAP Sarawak but only the peoples’ agendas in mind.
Certain political party shouts “Sehati” without content and spirit. Its “Sehati” is meaningless not only to the rakyat but for most of its loyal followers, among them were Kapitams, Penghulus, even some MPs and Aduns. Its recent leadership struggle showed its true color and that it was sorely for its leaders’ personal interests and power struggle. The recent “show” put up by SUPP was indeed a Class 3 performance by any standard. Its ending was not only an anti-climax but truly buried the spirit of democracy. At first, the leaders of the so called reform camp came out to put fault and blame on George Chan for the lost of the Mayor ship of Bandar Kuching South and the humiliating defeat of the SUPP in May 20th state election. Then all the dirty laundry were put on public display as print media gave both camp the front page coverage although they were non-deserving. The reform camp started in the central region where Soon Koh’s power is based. Both the Sibu and Bintagor branch launched a “down with George” campaign in kuching where many of its CEC members and MPs and Aduns also attended. Altogether, more than 25% of the SUPP joined the reform camp and banners with the slogan “SUPP unsafe if George is not down” were seen everywhere. They called George to resign from the party’s top post or else face the non-confidence motion to be tabled at its 10/12/2006 EGM.

Its deputy Chairman spearheaded the attack on George Chan and he said that George stabbed him from behind that caused him the lost of his federal cabinet post in 2004. He further claimed that he was the one who let George took over the Chairmanship after Tan Sri Wong Soon Kai lost his bukit Assek seat in 1996, and this insinuated how generous he was and how ungrateful George is. This got George fuming and it was reported in the press that his lawyer filed a defamation suit against Law Hieng Ding. According to Law, his intention to bring down George Chan was for the sake of the SUPP and not because he was dropped as a federal minister. Of course, Soon Koh came out and defended his action to bring down George because it was George who betrayed the party by suing Law when he talked about party unity.

When everyone expected a power struggle on the 10/12/2006, Law brought Soon Koh and our “beloved” Robert Lau to a closed door meeting with the representatives of the George’s camp. Then it was all over and the Sibu and Bintagor branch dropped its motion unconditionally. What Happened? What transpired in the meeting? Nobody knows and not even those who shouted the slogan for Soon Koh know. They were all being played out by their own leaders. How that could happen if the leaders are responsible? One Adun was so worried that he told his friends that he regretted joining the reform camp but he was forced to join or else he might be sidelined.

But one thing for certain is that someone interfered. Was it Taib? I would not know but I do know that both George and Soon Koh are merely puppets and Taib is the true puppets’ master just like the SUPP is the puppet of the PBB in the state BN. I would suggest the reform camp to kick start a campaign to kick Taib out of the the CM office and the slogan should be “Taib not down, nobody is safe”. If they truly want SUPP to survive, they should channel all their energy to bring Taib down and not only to bring down George “the brother-in-law”.

Alas, I would never believe in the politics of the SUPP and I never have any faith in any of its leaders to stand up to what the people want them to do. They are all for themselves, the top brass of the SUPP and never for their grassroots and the rakyat. They are all rich and famous while those who supported them suffered in dismay because they might not be able to keep their homes once their land leases expire and their children might not have the luxury of receiving mother tongue education because the BN is definitely against Chinese education.

There is another untold and unpublished story in the saga; I was approached by one person who told me that the Sibu SUPP intended to form a new political party if the reform camp lost out in the power struggle. He told me that they are all ready for war but in the event that George wins, then they are ready to start a new party and came out to challenge the SUPP and the DAP in the next parliamentary election. I was asked very discreetly about the prospect of me teaming with them in that eventuality. Of course my answer was not in question at all. But this event shows us the true color of the SUPP’s leaders.

My dear comrade, our Chairman has on the 17/12/2006 delivered his policy speech that DAP Sarawak intends to cooperate with the right political entities to from the government in 2020. That is a dream that our chairman has and it is a dream for the DAP as well not only to be contented with the present scenario. It is s dream I and many of our state leaders also share. It is like what Mr. Martin King of the US African congress has said earlier “I have a dream”.

Is it possible? Yes, everything is possible with the right mindset and as the saying goes “if you believe you can, then you can”. I would like to call on all our comrades to go for the common goal and to make it a reality. For a start, we must have the following essential ingredients:
1) Self-believe – we must believe in ourselves and our goal and only then we have the confidence to face the world. Only the self-believer is the end winner.
2) Self respect or self-love- we must love and respect our selves and stand guard against any personal behaviors that might tarnish our reputation and the party’s image. Bear in mind that the people look up to us and their respect can only be won and not bought. This is the single most important criteria for any party leader.
3) Self-improvement- we have to keep on improving ourselves and the quality of service we provide. The people expectation is our basic scale and our leaders must live up to the expectation and learning is the key to self-improvement.

Regards,
David Wong
DAP Sarawak Publicity Sec.,
21/12/2006

Friday, August 24, 2007

Suaram calls for an explanation from the government

Dr Kua Kia Soong, a director of SUARAM was denied entry into Sarawak at 9pm, 23 August 2007. Kua, who is also principal of the community-funded New Era College, was on his way to officiate the graduation ceremony of teachers who have attained the New Era College Diploma in Education at Kuching and Sibu.

After screening Kua's MyKad, the immigration officer at Kuching airport informed him that he had been refused entry into Sarawak because he is on the "blacklist for involvement in anti-logging activities". From the computer reading of Kua's MyKad, the officer also knew that Kua is a former member of parliament.

Dr Kua has been an active campaigner against the Bakun Dam project and was a member of the fact finding mission to enquire into the conditions faced by indigenous peoples displaced from the Bakun area to Sungai Asap resettlement camp in 1998

Below is our reply to Mr. 郑文辉(MoonHui), Coordinator, Suara Rakyat Malaysia (SUARAM)

Our Mr. Fong Pau Teck forwarded your message about Sarawak government refusal to grant Suaram's Dircetor, Dr. Kua entry into our state.

We feel that the state government has abused its power to refuse entry to a law-abiding citizen land well-known personality like Dr. Kua. Although it was stated in the 21 points agreement when Sarawak joined the Federation to form Malaysia that we have the special right in the matter of immigrations, but that was to safeguard the people interests in Sarawak and not that of the state government. We also believe in the freedom of movemnet of peace loving and law abiding citizen and Sarawak surely welcome Malaysian form the penisular to travel here not only for the tourism industry but also in promote mutual understanding and national integration as well. Please be informed that we have several leaders who have been subjected to Dr. Kua's similiar treatment, noteably among them is of course our Opposition leader in the Parliament, Mr. Lim Kit Siang.

However, i wonder how Dr. Kua could enter the state earlier with the old IC card as previously passport was required instead of the the identity card. Furthermore, the JPN never admitted that other infomation was stored in Mykad apart from the identities and maybe the religious of the Mykad holder.

If your goodself could produce us the proof that the state and federal government have stored other informations apart from the identities, we would be much oblige to highlight this matter as it is surely against our basic human rights, such as our right for privacy. We are even more concerned that the government has used Mykad to identitfy certain group of Malaysian because of the their anti-government stand or because thi

We are happy that you sent us this email and we hope that we would be able to work together to make the government accountable for its actions.

Happy 50th Merdeka.


Regards,
David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity sec.
24-08-2007




Thursday, August 23, 2007

Freedom of the press is the key to our democracy

民主行动党砂州宣传秘书黄培根说,在新闻自由与民主前提下,该党甚关注诗巫警方与传媒之间的紧张关系。 他说,在警方也许会采用官方机密法令对付采取警方新闻的记者事件曝光之后,经引起了公众人士极大的反弹,假如警方真的严正利用官方机密法令对付记者,这将是新闻自由的终结,也是马来西亚民主的结束。

他说,传媒是社会的支柱,正如汤玛杰菲逊的名言:“我们的自由(权)依据在新闻自由上”以及瓦尔特(Walter Cronkite)的“新闻自由不仅对民主是重要的,它就是民主”。 他说,1972官方机密法令(OSA)是马来西亚的一条禁止被列入官方机密资讯的揭露,它是源自于英国的官方机密法令。 他说,官方机密法令广受抨击,认为减低了政府的透明度,将新闻变成了另一种的政府宪报,而它的执行标准亦受到置疑。

我国新闻不自由 “我们发现到许多的资讯与文件受到官方机密法令的保护,而无法让公众人士获知,在2006年,我国的新闻自由在世界194个国家的排名中名列141,落在香港(65),印度(81),菲律宾(89)及泰国(107)之后,官方机密法令经使我国的地位被列其中一个不自由的国家。” 有关法令的部分内容是:被鉴别为高度机密、绝对机密的文件与资讯可经过联邦部长或州务大臣或首席部长或授权的官员列入机密。同时有关文件必须是关于国家安全、国防与国际关系。

“如果我们进一步了解这条法令,我们会发现官方机密法令不能够用作来抵制新闻,除非有关文件或资讯在法令之下被鉴别为机密。” “难道传媒采访诗巫的犯罪新闻,危害到国家安全与外国关系?如果我们回头看传媒与警方之间的冷淡关系,我们看到没有任何新闻违反法律。当然,我们了解黑帮问题在国会中被揭露出来之后,警方所面对的巨大压力,但是警方是否也指责那些翔实报导的传媒呢?”

传媒是警民桥梁 总警长丹斯里哈出慕沙多次强调,公众与警方合作是打击罪犯的要素,而寻求公众的合作,行动党相信,传媒在彼此间的合作上扮演重要的角色。 他说,我们无法想像,有朝一日,当传媒杯葛警方新闻,而运用他们本身的方式获取新闻,会使社会变成一种怎样的现象,就因为警方仇视新闻界。

他说,行动党相信诗巫的传媒具有高度的专业精神来获取新闻与资讯。 他表示,警方与传媒之间的良好关系需要在公众利益之下继续的维持,行动党希望警方在未来不要在未经授权的情况之下,对传媒发出警告,而须将传媒当作是警方的朋友看待。

Below is the original post in English:-

DAP is very concerned with the tense relationship between the Police of Sibu and the media. The front page coverage of the whole episode had received much criticism and concern from the general public especially when the police issued the warning that the OSA might be used against the press. If indeed the police are serious in using the OSA against the press for reporting the news, then that would be the end of press freedom and indeed the end of democracy in Malaysia.

The press is the pillar of a society, as the following famous quotes show;
“Our liberty depends on freedom of the press and that cannot be limited without being lost.”
-Thomas Jefferson
“Freedom of the press is not just important to democracy, it is democracy.”
-Walter Cronkite

The Official Secrets Act 1972 is a statute in Malaysia prohibiting the disseminating of information classified as official secrets. The legislation is based on the Official Secrets Act of the United Kingdom.

The OSA has been criticized as reducing government transparency and made the press into another Government Gazette and its implementation has been questioned for the classification standard. We have seen many information and documents been withheld from the general public through the use of the OSA. The Global Press Rankings 2006 ranked Malaysia at 141 out of the total of 194, behind Hong Kong (65), India (81), Philippines (89) and Thailand (107). The OSA surely contributes much towards our nation’s status as one of “not free” nations.


The act defines an "official secret" as:
“ ...any document specified in the Schedule and any information and material relating thereto and includes any other official document, information and material as may be classified as 'Top Secret', 'Secret', 'Confidential' or 'Restricted', as the case may be, by a Minister, the Menteri Besar or Chief Minister of a State or such public officer [as may be authorised to classify such documents by a Minister, Menteri Besar or Chief Minister]. ”
The Schedule to the Act covers "Cabinet documents, records of decisions and deliberations including those of Cabinet committees", as well as similar documents for state executive councils. It also includes "documents concerning national security, defence and international relations".
If we take a closer look at the act, we can see that the OSA cannot be used against the press until such time that a certain document or information has been “classified” as ‘Secret” as defined in the act.
Is press coverage of the crimes’ news in Sibu a threat to the national security and foreign relations? If we look at the standoff between the police and the press in Sibu, we would be able to see there was nothing to the nature. Of course we understand that the police has been under tremendous pressure earlier when the triads issues were brought up in the parliament and received front page coverage in the national dailies. But should the police point their fingers at the press for truthful reporting?
The IGP Tan Sri Hassan Musa has stressed many times that the cooperation of the general public with the police is the key to crime fighting and has praised the general public for their support and we believe that the press plays the key to this cooperation. We can’t imagine the day when the press boycotts the news of the police or goes their own ways in informations gathering or news reporting because of the police’s perception of the press as their enermy.
DAP trusts that the press in Sibu has been very professional in gathering information and news reporting. The press has on numerous time assisted the police in disseminating information to the general public that were found helpful to the general public as well as the police. The good relationship between the police and the press should continue for the interest of the general public and we hope that the police should not issue unwarranted warning to the press in the future and should treat the press as the “friend of the police.”
Let it be known to all quarters that the people will be the judges and no act or government policies can overshadow the principle that “the press is democracy.”

DAP Sarawak publicity sec.
David Wong
24-06-2007

David Wong's blog: negarakuku

David Wong's blog: negarakuku

negarakuku

The song that touches the nerve of the Malaysian politicians and rakyat has unfortunately become the central issue of the country as we prepare to celebrate our 50 years of Merdeka. It is most unwarranted that the government forgot the nation building’s Social Contract (社会契约), which should be all forgiving and understanding as it was built on equality, justice and fairness for all. Our forefathers had intended that the Social Contract be the instrument that preaches mutual respect and forgivingness for our multiracial and multicultural society in our nation building. As we enter our 50th Merdeka, we should use our patriotism to lead this country into the next 50 years. It is timely that the leaders of the country from all political spectrum to promote racial harmony and nation building instead of scarifying and prosecuting this poor youth for their own political mileage. Wee is just a scapegoat for the politicians in their need to hunt for cheap publicity as the general election looms near. The government on the other hand is seen by many to blow this issue out of proportion to divert the attention of the nation from the social injustices, crimes, corruptions and mismanagement of the country’s economy. Its controlled print and electronic medias are going all out as if Wee is the No. 1 enemy of the state and as if his song would topple the nation which we have built for 50 years. If we take a closer look at the song, which titled “Negarakuku” or “我爱我的国家” in mandarin, it is not meant to insult the national anthem or propagandize any racial overtones. Furthermore, the poor youth has apologized (arranged by the ruling BN’s Chinese based MCA) to the whole nation for his unintended and misappropriated action although many believe that most if not all in his lyrics do reflect the truth and echo the sentiments of many, especially the youth, in this country. As we enter our 50th Merdeka, I think the nation and its peoples have achieved the maturity and wisdom to differentiate the truth from the mischievous. We should be able to “forgive and forget” (包容 和谅解) as what is been preached in our “social contract”. Political leaders in Malaysia, especially the ruling UMNO is seeing and trying to draw “red” in this issue and will not let go of it and they are trying to outmatch “Negarakuku” in their search for self political mileage. It is most unwarranted while the government tries to prosecute the poor youth after the PM and his cabinet members have accepted his apology; many of its leaders have shown even worse by raising sensitive racial issues such as the May 13 incident, drawing the “Keris” out in their party’s general assembly, or youth leader threatened to burn down the Selangor Chinese Hall (雪华堂) and member of Parliament challenging those disgruntling Malaysian Chinese to “go back to China.” These leaders’ statements and actions are 100 times more potent than Wee’s to our national integration and racial harmonious relation but they are not been warned or reprimanded by the UMNO and the government. The government should not channel all its energy and use all its machineries, such as the print and electronic medias, against Wee and his song. It should instead focus on many pressing issues such as 1) corruptions of its top officials, 2) mismanagement of the economy, 3) brain-drain and racial tension caused by unfair and unjust educational policies, 4) crimes and security of the peoples, 5) unfair distributions of government projects and funding and 6) rubber stamping of the Parliament. Who is Wee as compared to all these issues? On behalf of DAP Sarawak, I urge the government and all the politicians to rest Wee’s case and show our forgivingness. On the eve of this 50th Merdeka, let us concentrate our effort to build a nation that our forefathers and our children would be proud of, a nation builds on equality, fairness and justice for all. Without these ingredients, this multiracial and multicultural society will be stagnated in our search for prosperity and advancement and the government has the duty and responsibility to lead by example.

David Wong
DAP Sarawak publicity secretary
19-08-2007


DAVID WONG'S BLOG

MOUTH PIECE 4 SARAWAKIAN

Blog Archive

Labels